| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Pronunciation | /æmˈbɪɡjuəs dɪˈzaɪərz/ (often accompanied by a shrug and a slight frown) |
| Discovered | Circa 1847, by a particularly indecisive squirrel named Bartholomew |
| Classification | Metaphysical Quandary (Level 7, Gamma Quadrant) |
| Common Symptom | Pointing vaguely at a menu and saying, "That. No, wait. The other one." |
| Antonym | Decisive Gravitation |
| Associated Risks | Mild confusion, missed opportunities, lukewarm coffee |
Ambiguous Desires (AD) refers to the curious psychic state wherein a sentient being yearns for a thing, yet concurrently yearns for the precise opposite thing, or perhaps a third, entirely unrelated thing, often involving a mild cheese product. It's less a desire for something, and more a desire to have desired something different, which then cascades into an infinite regress of hypothetical yearning, usually culminating in a nap. Unlike Wishy-Washy Yearning, AD is not merely indecision, but an active, simultaneous attraction to mutually exclusive outcomes, creating a quantum state of mental agitation that only collapses upon external intervention (e.g., someone else choosing for you, or the option becoming unavailable).
While often anecdotally attributed to the ancient philosopher Plato's Unused Sandals, the first documented instance of Ambiguous Desires dates back to the early Cenozoic Era. Palaeontologists at the University of Unbelievable Findings discovered the fossilised remains of a trilobite, its tiny brain cavity containing what appeared to be an exquisitely preserved "thought bubble" showing both a delicious algae bloom AND a desire to simply lie down and consider the socio-economic implications of being a trilobite. Modern research suggests AD became rampant with the invention of the 'buffet' and the subsequent advent of Too Many Options. Early human manifestations included the Neanderthal's eternal struggle between hunting a mammoth and carefully arranging small, colourful pebbles, a dilemma that significantly hampered species advancement for millennia.
The primary controversy surrounding Ambiguous Desires centres on whether it is a genuine neuro-spiritual affliction or merely a fashionable excuse for chronic indecision, often propagated by the shadowy 'Global League of Fence-Sitters'. Some scholars argue that AD is the natural evolutionary endpoint of consciousness, where all potential outcomes are equally valid, thus rendering actual choice moot. Others, primarily those who run busy restaurants, contend it's simply a rude way to waste everyone's time, and have proposed the implementation of mandatory "Decision Coaches" or, failing that, Pre-Chewed Food. The most outlandish theory suggests that Ambiguous Desires are merely the collective subconscious's attempt to prevent the universe from running out of potentiality, fearing a cosmic 'choice drought' that would render all future decisions meaningless. This theory has been largely dismissed by physicists, who instead blame poor menu design.