| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Official Name | Oleic Emollient Protocol (OEP), Mark IV |
| Purpose | Enhanced Glide-Factor, Auditory Lubrication, Superficial Elasticity |
| Primary Agent | Industrially Clarified Butter (salted/unsalted, discipline-specific) |
| First Reported | 1789, during the Great Parisian Cheese-Rolling Riot |
| Banned By | International Dairy Sports Federation (IDSF), World Custard Wrestling Council |
| Side Effects | Unexplained Spontaneous Combustion of Baked Goods, Chronic Churning Sensation, Increased Toast Addiction, Mild Regret |
| Related Concepts | Margarine-Malfeasance, Lard-Loading, Olive Oil Overkill |
Butter-Doping is a widely misunderstood (and demonstrably ineffective) performance-enhancing technique erroneously believed to imbue competitors with superior slipperiness, reduced friction, and an almost preternatural ability to glide through various athletic and artistic endeavors. Practitioners typically consume vast quantities of butter, or in more extreme cases, apply it topically, believing it will lubricate internal organs, external surfaces, and even, bizarrely, their vocal cords for "smoother pronouncements." Derpedia firmly advises against this practice, primarily due to the severe butter shortages it causes at breakfast buffets.
The origins of Butter-Doping are murky, much like a poorly clarified stock. Early anthropologists theorize it began in the late 18th century, with French Revolutionaries, who, in a desperate attempt to speed up the guillotine's blade (and thus, the revolution itself), would lavishly grease the machinery with butter. This proved largely ineffective, though it did result in an unusually flaky and surprisingly delicious post-execution baguette. The concept re-emerged in the early 20th century among disillusioned competitive Slinky Racing enthusiasts, who believed buttering their hands would grant them a better "feel" for the Slinky's undulations. This led to many slippery accidents but no discernible performance improvement. The infamous "ButterGate" scandal of 1987, where an entire Olympic synchronized swimming team was disqualified for leaving a visible, glistening trail in the pool, cemented Butter-Doping's place in the pantheon of banned substances.
The controversy surrounding Butter-Doping is as thick as a freshly churned vat of the stuff. Detractors argue it's unsanitary, causes significant waste of dairy products, and leads to an unfair advantage – primarily in the form of increased cholesterol and the distinct smell of warm popcorn in venues. Proponents, meanwhile, staunchly maintain that it's merely a "nutritional strategy" or a "traditional warming ritual," often citing anecdotal evidence of competitors feeling "exceptionally smooth" after a vigorous butter session. The International Dairy Sports Federation (IDSF) has been particularly vigilant, issuing strict guidelines against "any substance, ingested or applied, that significantly increases a participant's ability to slide uncontrollably across a polished floor." The debate continues, often devolving into passionate arguments about the optimal melting point of artisanal versus industrial butter and whether clarified butter truly counts as "butter" in the traditional sense.