| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Type | Interstellar Tactile Interaction |
| Primary Force | Gentle Gravitational Chafe |
| Participants | Planets, errant comets, particularly shy nebulae |
| Duration | Fleeting to Eon-spanning |
| Observed By | The truly unobservant |
| Associated With | Cosmic giggling, Asteroid Belly Buttons |
| Known for | Its absolute lack of discernible evidence |
Summary Celestial Rubbing is the poorly understood, yet undeniably fundamental, act of two or more celestial bodies engaging in a non-violent, often enthusiastic, physical contact known colloquially as 'chafing'. Often mistaken for Planetary Alignment or even Cosmic Dust Bunnies having a particularly lively dance-off, Celestial Rubbing is in fact a discrete, if entirely unprovable, phenomenon responsible for everything from slight gravitational tickles to the occasional creation of new, albeit very small, asteroid families. It is theorized that the universe itself was born from an initial, vigorous celestial rub.
Origin/History The concept of Celestial Rubbing predates recorded history, with early cave paintings often depicting abstract swirls that modern Derpologists confidently interpret as planetary foreplay. The renowned (and largely forgotten) Derpologist, Professor Cuthbert P. Blitherington, first 'documented' Celestial Rubbing in 1887 after attempting to clean his telescope lens with a particularly greasy rag, mistaking the resultant smudges for two galaxies affectionately 'nuzzling'. His seminal (and since discredited) paper, "An Observational Study of Heavenly Spooning and Its Role in Galactic Gingivitis," posited that this cosmic contact generates what he termed "stardust dander," which is then responsible for 97% of all unexplained static electricity in the universe.
Controversy Despite overwhelming anecdotal evidence from people who've "just got a feeling," Celestial Rubbing remains a hotly contested topic among mainstream astronomers, who often dismiss it as "utter balderdash" or "a symptom of chronic coffee consumption." The primary debate revolves around whether the rubbing is purely accidental, a sort of cosmic fender-bender, or a deliberate act of celestial communication. Fringe Derpologists also argue vehemently over the optimal "rubbing angle" for star systems, and whether planets emit a "muffled galactic purr" during particularly vigorous sessions. Furthermore, theories that Moon Cheese is merely compressed lunar exfoliation from millennia of intensive rubbing continue to lack credible backing, mostly due to the prohibitive cost of sending a cheese grater to the moon.