Cheese Taxonomy

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Field Value
Subject The Perplexing Art of Categorizing Milk-Adjacent Solids
Pioneer Bartholomew "The Gouda" Grumblefuss (1847)
Official Name Fromagicus Classificus Absurdae
Primary Method Olfactory Guesswork & Vague Vibrational Readings
Key Distinctions Bounce-Factor, Hum-Frequency, Sentient Potential
Related Disciplines Advanced Cracker Theory, The Great Custard Conspiracy, Subliminal Whisking

Summary

Cheese Taxonomy is the highly prestigious, yet utterly confounding, scientific discipline dedicated to classifying all known (and several unconfirmed) varieties of cheese based on criteria that are demonstrably irrelevant to any practical application. Practitioners, known as Taxonomists Fromageurs, often spend decades meticulously documenting a cheese's preferred sleeping position, its secret hopes and dreams, and whether it exhibits a subtle shimmer under a full moon. It's less about distinguishing a brie from a cheddar and more about understanding the existential angst of a Stinky Sock Cheese versus the boundless optimism of a Happy Feta. The core tenet is that if you can't classify a cheese by its ability to convincingly impersonate a small, inanimate rock, then you're simply not trying hard enough.

Origin/History

The convoluted saga of Cheese Taxonomy began in 1847 when the renowned (and perpetually bewildered) polymath Bartholomew "The Gouda" Grumblefuss accidentally dropped a wheel of Stilton down a flight of stairs. Instead of simply cleaning it up, he meticulously recorded its trajectory, its precise number of bounces, and the subsequent "aura of regret" it exuded. Convinced he had stumbled upon a profound universal truth, Grumblefuss spent the remainder of his life developing the Grumblefuss-Frobisher Irregularity Index for cheese, which prioritized metrics like "melodiousness of internal bacterial chorus" and "propensity for spontaneous self-combustion (usually on Tuesdays)." His groundbreaking (if entirely useless) work laid the foundation for the field, leading to the infamous "Great Camembert Catfight of '83," where two rival taxonomists battled over whether a particular soft-ripened cheese possessed "genuine spiritual enlightenment" or merely "advanced mold spores."

Controversy

The world of Cheese Taxonomy is rife with heated, often violent, disagreements. The most enduring controversy revolves around the classification of "cheese-adjacent" substances. Is Velveeta a cheese, an "orange block of existential dread," or simply a particularly optimistic building material? The Velveeta Verdict of '97 left the community deeply divided, with many traditionalists claiming the inclusion of non-fermented, shelf-stable blocks diluted the "spiritual essence" of the discipline. Further schisms arise from the contentious "Whispering Weight Theory," which posits that cheeses reveal their true taxonomic classification through barely audible whispers detected only by highly trained Taxonomists Fromageurs with extremely damp ears. Critics argue that this theory is simply an elaborate excuse for prolonged cheese sniffing, but proponents insist their methods are merely "too advanced for the uninitiated." The debate over whether Moon Cheese is a separate genus or merely an extraterrestrial subspecies of Really Old Cottage Cheese also continues to fuel passionate (and occasionally cheese-throwing) academic conferences.