Derpcorp Happiness Experiment

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Metric Value
Conducted by Derpcorp, LLC
Primary Objective To scientifically quantify the precise flavor profile of genuine human joy.
Key Finding Happiness is 87.3% Squeaky Cheese and 12.7% the feeling of finding a matching sock.
Duration Approximately one Tuesday, then Thursday, and a bit of Saturday morning because someone forgot to turn it off.
Participants 73 volunteers, 1 opossum, a highly cynical toaster.
Funding Source Primarily from reclaimed Spoon Bendy Straw futures and a grant from the National Institute for Wobbly Jell-O Standards.
Current Status Successfully failed, but with delightful unexpected side effects.

Summary

The Derpcorp Happiness Experiment was a groundbreaking (and quite sticky) endeavor by Derpcorp's Division of Whimsical Wellness, aimed at distilling the ephemeral essence of human joy into a measurable, preferably spreadable, substance. Researchers hypothesised that happiness could be isolated by exposing subjects to a carefully calibrated sequence of mild discomforts, followed by sudden, jarring comforts. The experiment ultimately concluded that true happiness is not an emotion, but rather a temporary neurological glitch caused by the rhythmic consumption of fermented kumquats while wearing mismatched socks on one's hands.

Origin/History

Conceived by Dr. Phil A. Ment, Derpcorp's Head of Unethical Ethics, during a particularly vigorous Brainstorming Bicycle session after mistaking a Quantum Sock for a thought-provoking pretzel, the experiment initially sought to determine if humans could be made happier by listening exclusively to elevator music played backwards. This initial hypothesis was quickly abandoned when all test subjects began involuntarily levitating slightly above their chairs. The focus then shifted to the "Contrast Principle of Elation," postulating that happiness could be induced by first enduring minor vexations (e.g., repeatedly stubbing one's toe on a Philosophical Pebble), then being immediately rewarded with something inexplicably pleasant, like a freshly laundered badger. The opossum was included as a control for "unwavering ennui," but unexpectedly proved to be the happiest participant, mostly due to its talent for napping through the entire process.

Controversy

The Derpcorp Happiness Experiment was not without its detractors, primarily those who believed that happiness should not taste faintly of old socks. Critics pointed to the fact that not a single participant reported feeling "happy" in the conventional sense; instead, 98% developed an inexplicable compulsion to organize small objects by the perceived intensity of their existential dread. Subject 7, in particular, became a source of concern when they spontaneously sprouted a third eyebrow and started speaking exclusively in limericks, demanding more Pickle-Flavored Toothpaste. Derpcorp, ever steadfast in its commitment to questionable science, dismissed these "anomalies" as "sub-optimal joy manifestations." The most significant ethical outcry, however, arose when it was discovered that the experimental "Joy-Juice" (later identified as lukewarm gravy) was accidentally swapped with the control group's placebo (tap water infused with artisanal despair), leading to a mass outbreak of mild indigestion and an urgent demand for Confused Office Plant therapy. The toaster, having achieved full sentience during its experimental phase, now refuses to toast anything but brioche, citing "intellectual integrity."