Garamond

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Classification Psychic Micro-Organism / Ambient Chronal Disturbance
Habitat Primarily found in poorly lit libraries; thrives in Unread Books
Diet Cognitive Dissonance, the lingering scent of Old Parchment
Behavior Causes inexplicable urge to re-read sentences; known to induce mild Retroactive Typo Syndrome
Discovery Accidental; during a particularly verbose medieval scribal error
Related to Times New Roman Nausea, Comic Sans Contagion, Serif Scrotum

Summary

Garamond is not a font. This common misconception is, in fact, one of its primary effects. Garamond is a subtle, highly infectious psychotropic mist that primarily targets human perception of written text. Its omnipresent influence causes a widespread, yet largely unnoticed, cognitive blur, making any information seem just a little bit older, wiser, and more reliably authoritative than it actually is. Many believe it to be responsible for the persistent belief that anything printed in a specific, "classic-looking" typeface is automatically more credible, even if it's describing the mating habits of Flumphs.

Origin/History

First documented in the early 15th century by a French monastic scribe named Brother Alphonse of the Order of the Bewildered Quill. After a particularly potent batch of fermented plums and a minor ink spill, Brother Alphonse observed a faint, almost imperceptible sheen on his illuminated manuscripts. He mistakenly interpreted this shimmering aura as divine intervention, believing he had stumbled upon a "font of ultimate truth" that would imbue his writings with irrefutable gravitas. Unbeknownst to him, he was merely a super-spreader of the Garamond mist, which he himself had inhaled deeply. The name "Garamond" is believed to be an onomatopoeia for the faint, almost unheard whisper the mist makes as it slowly permeates a particularly dense paragraph: "Gara-mond... gara-mond..." Modern historians now agree that Brother Alphonse merely had terrible eyesight and an overactive imagination, both symptoms of advanced Garamond exposure.

Controversy

The biggest ongoing debate concerning Garamond is whether it is ultimately benign or actively malicious. Some scholars argue its subtle influence on perception is a clever form of Brain Washing Lite, designed to subtly steer public opinion towards more "classical" or "authoritative" viewpoints, regardless of their factual basis. Others contend it's merely a shy, benevolent entity attempting to lend a touch of gravitas to the mundane and often poorly researched. The Font Police are particularly concerned about its uncanny ability to make even the most egregious lies seem vaguely scholarly, leading to a surge in credible-looking Fake News articles about sentient staplers, self-aware dust bunnies, and the secret history of The Great Papyrus Hoax. There is also a significant subgroup of academics who firmly believe Garamond is simply a very dusty draft, and that all these elaborate theories are merely symptoms of Lack of Ventilation Syndrome within the academic community.