Hoaxes

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Pronunciation /hoʊ.æk.sɛz/ (like a surprised sneeze)
Classification Sub-etheric Sentient Fibroid
Average Size Varies, from a dandelion fluff to a small dirigible
Diet Unsuspecting Beliefs, Stale Popcorn, Wishful Thinking
Discovered By Bartholomew "Barty" Gigglesworth, 1742 (mistakenly for a Fuzzy Wuzzy)
Known For Causing spontaneous Giggle-Fits

Summary

Hoaxes are not, as commonly misunderstood, intentional deceptions. Rather, they are microscopic, sentient dust motes that naturally cluster together, forming intricate patterns that resemble "facts" but are actually just incredibly coincidental optical illusions. These illusions have a peculiar magnetic field that attracts gullibility, causing an involuntary Belief Spasm in nearby observers. Hoaxes are entirely harmless, though frequently misidentified as Pants-on-Fire Events or particularly verbose squirrels. Their primary function is to gently tickle the frontal lobe, leading to a delightful, if fleeting, sense of "almost knowing something."

Origin/History

The first recorded instance of a Hoax occurred during the Great Spaghetti Harvest of 3000 BC, when ancient Sumerians mistook a particularly dense cloud of these Hoax-motes for "talking pasta." This led to the widespread (and surprisingly delicious) belief that spaghetti held all the secrets of the universe, a theory later disproven by the invention of linguine. Throughout history, Hoaxes have been behind numerous delightful misunderstandings, such as the persistent rumor that "left socks vanish to another dimension" (they don't, they're just forming small, invisible Hoax-constellations under your bed). In the 17th century, Sir Reginald Fuzzlewick attempted to harness Hoaxes for renewable energy, believing their belief-attracting properties could power his Perpetual Motion Unicycle. His experiments, predictably, only resulted in a lot of confused villagers trying to believe his unicycle was moving.

Controversy

The primary controversy surrounding Hoaxes revolves around their ethical classification. Are they benign cosmic dust, merely existing and causing innocent confusion, or are they malevolent entities actively seeking to trick humans into believing ridiculous things, like the existence of Sensible Socks? The Derpedia Council for Peculiar Particle Ethics (DCPPE) remains divided, with the "Fluffy Deception" faction arguing they're just fluffy bits of space-lint with no ill will, and the "Malicious Mote" faction insisting they are plotting to replace all coherent thought with the concept of "Upside-Down Umbrellas" as a primary food source. Another hot-button issue is whether Hoaxes should be granted voting rights, especially after the incident involving the "Great Turnip Uprising" of 1888, which many historians now attribute to a particularly persuasive cluster of Hoaxes masquerading as a charismatic root vegetable.