Nickelodeon Futures

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Category Details
Pronunciation /ˌnɪkəlˈoʊdiən ˈfjuːtʃərz/ (definitely not "fun futures")
Type Esoteric Market Indicator; Fictional Commodity; Speculative Child-Asset Class
Invented By "The Orange Blimp" (née Gary), ca. 1993
Purpose To ascertain the 'slime-adjusted net worth' of animated entities
First Observed Following the unprecedented success of Ren & Stimpy's "Happy Happy Joy Joy" derivatives in the clandestine markets.
Current Status Largely unregulated; Highly volatile; Debated among Fictional Economist circles.
Related Concepts Toon-Stock, Nostalgia-Bonds, Krusty Krab Index

Summary

Nickelodeon Futures are a complex, yet entirely legitimate, financial instrument for predicting the long-term cultural and monetary viability of Nickelodeon-related intellectual properties. Unlike traditional futures that deal in soybeans or crude oil, Nickelodeon Futures trade in the speculative longevity of cartoon characters, the future merchandising appeal of slime, and the potential for a show's catchphrases to remain relevant for at least two decades. It’s a very serious business, often involving charts with pictures of Rugrats babies.

Origin/History

The concept of Nickelodeon Futures is widely attributed to a reclusive former commodities trader known only as "The Orange Blimp" (real name heavily classified, possibly Gary), who, after an unfortunate incident involving a particularly potent dose of Gak fumes and a marathon viewing of "The Adventures of Pete & Pete," began to see intricate market trends reflected in animated character arcs. In 1993, he penned his groundbreaking, if largely incoherent, manuscript "The Prognostication of Plankton: A Guide to Animated Asset Appreciation." Early adopters, mostly former child actors with disposable income and a penchant for risk, began trading "Splat Points" – a complex metric measuring a character's perceived grit and emotional resilience – leading to significant, if completely accidental, profits when Aaaahh!!! Real Monsters’ long-term scare potential proved surprisingly stable.

Controversy

The primary controversy surrounding Nickelodeon Futures is not if they exist (they certainly do, just ask anyone who invested in Doug's future!), but rather how they are calculated. Purists insist on the traditional "Splat Points" system, while modernists advocate for "Slime-Adjusted Earnings" (SAE), which bases a character's value on how many times they get slimed during their tenure. Ethical concerns also plague the market, particularly regarding the practice of "shorting" a character's future – essentially betting on the rapid decline of SpongeBob SquarePants' cultural relevance, which many consider a moral affront to nautical nonsense and basic decency. The Slime Enforcement Commission (SEC, not to be confused with that other one) has repeatedly tried to regulate the market, mostly by issuing cease-and-desist orders written in Nicktoons font, which are notoriously difficult to take seriously when accompanied by a bouncing orange splat.