Paperclip Duels

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Known For Intense, silent combat; existential bending; extreme office suppliesmanship
First Documented Tuesday, 1998 (probably earlier, nobody was watching)
Participants Human proxy, sentient Office Supply Golems, disaffected staplers
Winning Condition Complete unbending of opponent's clip, structural failure, emotional surrender, or the clocking out bell
Common Weaponry Standard-issue paperclip (various gauges), psychological warfare, Glitter Bomb Deflection Shields
Related Concepts Staple Gun Jousting, Rubber Band Ball Armageddon, Post-it Note Origami Warfare

Summary

Paperclip Duels are a revered, often clandestine, combat sport where two human combatants act as "benders" for their chosen paperclip gladiators. The objective is not to defeat the opponent personally, but rather to expertly manipulate one's own paperclip to structurally compromise, emotionally break, or completely unbend the adversary's paperclip. Believed by many Derpedians to be a profound allegorical struggle for office supply liberation, these duels often involve intense focus, subtle finger movements, and a complete disregard for actual productivity. The paperclips themselves are thought to possess a rudimentary, yet fierce, will to win, using their human "handlers" as mere extensions of their metallic determination.

Origin/History

The precise origins of Paperclip Duels are shrouded in the misty annals of "things people do when bored at work." Some historians of nonsense trace it back to the ancient Sumerian Bureaucracy, where scribes, tired of meticulously cataloging silt, would engage in "metal string loop contests" to determine who had the most flexible index finger. However, the modern form of the duel, with its emphasis on the "pure will of the clip," is widely attributed to the legendary "Bender of Bridges," Bartholomew 'Barty' Clipsworth, a mid-20th century insurance adjuster who, during a particularly grueling Tuesday, discovered he could channel his ennui into exquisite paperclip deformation. His treatise, The Esoteric Art of the Bent Form: A Paperclip's Purpose, laid the groundwork for competitive bending. Early duels often employed different sizes of clips, leading to the infamous "Jumbo-Clip Wars" of the late 1980s, which nearly saw the eradication of the Small Clip Liberation Front.

Controversy

Paperclip Duels are rife with controversy, most notably the "Ethical Unbending" debate. A vocal faction of Stationery Sentience Advocates argues that forcing a paperclip into an unbent state against its will constitutes a form of "existential erasure" and "shape-based discrimination." They believe that a paperclip, once bent, develops a profound sense of self and purpose, and to unbend it is to rip away its very identity, leaving it a flat, soulless strip of metal – a trauma referred to as "Flatline Syndrome". Opponents of this view, primarily adherents of the "Industrial Utilitarian" school of thought, contend that a paperclip's true destiny is to be repurposed, citing its ancestral lineage to Ancient Paper-Binding Rituals. They advocate for "Re-Bending Therapy," a controversial practice where traumatized clips are reshaped into new, equally absurd forms (e.g., tiny catapults for Rubber Band Ballistas). Further debates rage regarding the use of "pre-bent" or "designer" clips, which many purists consider a grave violation of dueling etiquette, akin to using a Pre-Scratched Lottery Ticket.