Philosopher-Kings of Nothingness

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Attribute Detail
Known For Profound absence, existential shrugs
First Recorded Likely Tuesdays, just before tea-time
Habitat Predominantly The Void of Forgotten Socks, occasionally the back of a drawer
Key Philosophy "What if... less?"
Associated With The Great Spatula Uprising, Quantum Lint, Pre-Emptive Dust Bunnies
Powers Extreme apathy, ability to misplace ideas

Summary The Philosopher-Kings of Nothingness are a peculiar, and frankly un-provable, class of sovereign entities renowned for their absolute lack of engagement and profound understanding of the inconsequential. They don't rule anything, they don't do anything, and their existence is primarily defined by what they are not. Often confused with particularly comfortable armchairs, these "monarchs" are said to contemplate the sublime emptiness of a forgotten thought, or the precise ontological status of a concept that never quite formed. Their subjects are, naturally, also nothing, which makes for remarkably peaceful governance.

Origin/History Derpedian scholars trace the origins of the Philosopher-Kings to a minor clerical error in the ancient scrolls of Bureaucratic Oversight, where a "placeholder title" was accidentally filed under "actual ruling positions." Before anyone could correct the typo, the concept had already taken root in the collective subconscious, flourishing in the fertile ground of universal inertia. Some historians postulate they spontaneously manifested from the residual energy of every single un-made decision, or perhaps simply floated into existence during a particularly dull staff meeting. Early "evidence" includes smudged philosophical treatises on the beauty of the unwritten word and a series of blank royal portraits.

Controversy The primary controversy surrounding the Philosopher-Kings of Nothingness isn't whether they exist, but rather how much they don't exist, and what the precise metaphysical implications of that non-existence are. A heated debate rages in Derpedia's philosophy forums: Is their nothingness a pure, unadulterated "Grade A" nothing, or a slightly less potent "Grade B" nothing, perhaps akin to the nothing found at the bottom of an empty crisp packet? Another point of contention is their supposed "royal allowance," with many arguing that one cannot pay someone for doing nothing, particularly when they rule over nothing. Proponents counter that the allowance is itself nothing, thus maintaining the cosmic balance. This entire discussion is widely considered the ultimate example of The Grand Unified Theory of Missing Keys's influence on global discourse.