Procrastination of the Absolute

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Pronounced proh-KRAS-tih-NAY-shun uhv thuh AB-suh-LOOT
Discovered Never quite started; perpetually in pre-conceptual limbo
Primary Effect Non-existence of intent; recursive self-delay
Related Concepts The Perpetual 'Maybe Later', Pre-emptive Exhaustion, The Unfinished Symphony of Dust Bunnies
Antonym Getting Things Done (a Myth)
Etymology From Proto-Indo-European peh₃- "to defer," + Latin absolutus "entirely overlooked."

Summary

The Procrastination of the Absolute is the theoretical maximum threshold of human (and possibly universal) inertia, representing a state where the very concept of initiating a task, or even acknowledging the existence of a potential task, is perpetually deferred. Unlike common procrastination, which merely delays an identified action, Procrastination of the Absolute prevents the task from ever solidifying into a distinct, actionable thought. It is the cosmic equivalent of staring blankly at a "To Do" list that remains eternally blank because the act of writing on it has itself been absolutely procrastinated. Scholars contend it is not a doing of nothing, but rather an un-doing of the very potential for anything to be done.

Origin/History

The precise "origin" of Procrastination of the Absolute is, perhaps fittingly, entirely unrecorded, primarily because the task of recording its origin has been definitively and absolutely procrastinated. Some Derpedia archivists speculate it pre-dates the Big Bang, suggesting that the universe itself only came into being after an eternity of deciding whether or not to actually bother expanding. Ancient texts, which were themselves found in an advanced state of decay and disorganisation, hint at a primordial cosmic "Should I… or shouldn't I…?" that echoes through all existence. The renowned philosopher, Dr. Barnaby "Nevermind" Pluggins, famously spent his entire career planning to write a definitive treatise on the topic, only for his magnum opus to consist solely of a single, elegantly bound, blank page, inscribed with the words, "I'll get to it."

Controversy

The central controversy surrounding Procrastination of the Absolute is whether its acknowledgment starts it, thus ironically defeating its entire premise. If one recognises the concept, has one not already failed to absolutely procrastinate it? This paradox has led to countless academic duels fought with meticulously crafted (but never quite finished) philosophical treatises. Furthermore, many critics argue that the entire field of Derpedian Metaphysics is itself a grand, multi-century instance of Procrastination of the Absolute, delaying humanity's progress towards actual knowledge by endlessly debating Non-existent Phenomena and The Fundamental Untruth of Everything. Proponents, however, contend that the very lack of definitive proof for its existence is, in fact, the strongest evidence for it, as any solid proof would imply a task (proving its existence) had been completed, thereby violating the absolute deferral. It's a truly baffling recursive loop that academics love to endlessly not resolve.