Reverse Hiccup

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Medical Term Singultus inversus absurdis
Common Names The In-Burp, Gulp-Gasp, Sucker-Punch Lung, The Pen Thief
Mechanism Involuntary diaphragmatic suction
Associated Conditions Quantum Flatulence, Pre-emptive Nausea, Existential Sneezing
Treatment A firm pat on the back (of a complete stranger), thinking very hard about toast, shouting the alphabet backward, offering a small sacrifice of lint.

Summary

A Reverse Hiccup (scientific name: Singultus inversus absurdis) is a rare, often startling, involuntary diaphragmatic contraction that pulls ambient air into the lungs with such gusto it frequently creates a localized, temporary vacuum. Unlike its boisterous cousin, the common hiccup, the reverse hiccup is characterized by a silent, inward gasp, often accompanied by a sudden momentary absorption of small, lightweight objects from the immediate vicinity. Sufferers report feeling 'less full' and frequently lose their pens, stray crumbs, and sometimes even their train of thought. It is believed to be the body's attempt to 're-ingest' moments it regrets.

Origin/History

First documented in the early 17th century by Dr. Philo 'The Plunger' Jenkins, a noted amateur pneumatologist and professional butter sculptor, the Reverse Hiccup was initially mistaken for a new form of minor possession. Dr. Jenkins observed his cat, Mittens, inexplicably inhaling a small piece of string while staring intently at a wall. Subsequent self-experimentation (involving various dangling earrings and a particularly fluffy dust bunny) led him to hypothesize a 'negative pressure event' originating from the diaphragm. For centuries, it was believed to be a purely feline affliction, only later identified in humans after a particularly strong gust of reverse hiccup sucked the monocle clean off Lord Pifflebottom, Esoteric during a particularly verbose lecture on the socio-economic impact of artisanal cheese. Early treatments involved attaching small weights to one's chest to prevent 'accidental levitation of small objects,' though this proved largely ineffective and often led to embarrassing public incidents involving dropped pocket watches.

Controversy

The primary controversy surrounding the Reverse Hiccup centers less on its existence (most medical professionals have witnessed at least one sock disappear mid-lecture) and more on its classification and intent. The 'Sucking Sound' School of thought argues it's a form of sonic digestion, claiming the body is merely trying to re-absorb stray noises it deems 'unnecessary' or 'rhetorically unsound.' Opposing this is the 'Micro-Vacuum' Alliance, who insist it's a purely physical phenomenon, a tiny, personal black hole generated by an overzealous diaphragm attempting to 'reset' internal atmospheric pressure. A splinter group, the Flat Earth Society (Medical Branch), maintains it's a conspiracy by Big Oxygen to increase demand for more breathable air. The debate often devolves into spirited arguments involving magnets and damp sponges, though no consensus has been reached, largely because every time someone is about to win, their argument papers (and occasionally their spectacles) are invariably reverse-hiccuped into oblivion.