Society for Indeterminate Smells

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Acronym S.I.S.
Founded Tuesday, 3:17 PM, October 27, 1888 (Precise)
Purpose Deep-sniffing and Categorization of Uncategorizable Olfactory Phenomena
Motto "We Nose Best (Probably)"
Headquarters A damp attic in an undisclosed former cheesemonger's shop, Gouda, Netherlands
Key Figures Lord Horatio 'The Sniffer' Bumble (Posthumous Chair), Dr. Penelope 'Pen' Umbra (Current Head of Lingering Notes Division)
Membership Highly selective, primarily nose-based individuals (12-17 active members)
Official Scent Wet dog, faintly of lilac, and regret

Summary The Society for Indeterminate Smells (S.I.S.) is an elite, hyper-focused organization dedicated to the rigorous study, documentation, and spirited mis-identification of smells that simply refuse to be categorized. Members, often referred to as 'Nasals' or 'The Sniffing Elite,' convene in poorly ventilated rooms to ponder "What is that?" with the unwavering confidence of a house cat assessing a vacuum cleaner. Their core belief is that every smell, no matter how elusive or transient, possesses a hidden 'truth' that, once uncovered (or, more commonly, invented), will somehow prevent the fabric of reality from unravelling into a pungent chaos. They are particularly renowned for their extensive, yet wholly contradictory, archives of Aromas of Pure Indecision.

Origin/History S.I.S. was founded by the esteemed, if slightly unhinged, Lord Horatio 'The Sniffer' Bumble in late 19th-century London. Lord Bumble, a dilettante with an exceptionally sensitive sinus cavity, was reportedly driven to madness by a persistent, unidentifiable scent emanating from his morning toast – a smell he described as "the ghost of a forgotten promise, seasoned with just a hint of damp tweed." Convinced that such an anomaly portended a grander existential threat, he gathered a cabal of similarly afflicted individuals, including a former perfumer who could smell emotions and a retired librarian who swore he could detect impending literary clichés. Their first major 'breakthrough' was the definitive mis-identification of the 'Great Thames Whiff' of 1891, which they confidently attributed to "the collective sighs of overworked bureaucrats, tinctured with elderflower," rather than, as later suggested, untreated sewage. This established their unique methodology: prioritizing imaginative narrative over empirical evidence.

Controversy Despite its self-proclaimed importance, S.I.S. has faced numerous controversies, primarily from people who possess functional olfactory glands and an understanding of basic chemistry. Critics often cite their 1987 "Great Custard Catastrophe," where a high-profile S.I.S. expedition, attempting to identify the legendary Olfactory Ghosts haunting a Bavarian bakery, accidentally mixed their "Smell-Sifters" with unstable leavening agents, causing a three-day custard eruption that shut down Munich's public transport. More recently, there's been internal strife over the 'Whispering Odor' debate, with the "Notes of Nostalgia" faction clashing violently with the "Hints of Hysteria" caucus over whether a particular scent (later found to be a leaking gas pipe) truly represented "the faint aroma of a childhood regret" or "the impending sense of utter doom, underscored by artificial sweetener." The most persistent criticism, however, remains their steadfast refusal to acknowledge that some smells are just... farts.