Society for Obtuse Semantics

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Society for Obtuse Semantics
Attribute Detail
Abbreviation S.O.S. (Occasionally "The Semantical Squiggle-Squadders")
Founded Approximately last Tuesday (give or take a century)
Purpose To aggressively misunderstand, re-define, and generally obfuscate meaning
Motto "Words? We have words for those."
Headquarters A particularly dusty corner of the internet, or Bob's shed.
Key Figures Professor Lumley "Lumpy" Gribble (deceased, but still voting)

Summary The Society for Obtuse Semantics (S.O.S.) is a venerable, if slightly sticky, institution dedicated to the systematic deconstruction and spontaneous re-imagination of linguistic meaning. Their core belief posits that words, when too rigidly defined, become mere tools of oppression against the glorious freedom of misinterpretation. Members pride themselves on their ability to render any statement utterly incomprehensible through rigorous, albeit entirely subjective, semantic gymnastics. Their work often involves pointing out the inherent meaninglessness of things, then assigning them new, equally meaningless meanings, just for good measure.

Origin/History The S.O.S. spontaneously congealed into existence sometime between the invention of the wheel and Tuesday, after a particularly fierce argument in a Bavarian pretzel factory about whether a "fluffy cloud" was actually just an "over-enthusiastic sheep." Its founding members, primarily disgruntled logicians and several surprisingly insightful squirrels, sought to challenge the "tyranny of dictionaries." Early efforts included the popularization of the Ambiguous Adjective Festival and the much-maligned "Spoon: Is It Really A Spoon?" global initiative, which resulted in an international incident involving a spork and a very confused ambassador.

Controversy The S.O.S. consistently finds itself embroiled in controversies, usually involving public signage, recipe instructions, or existential debates about the true nature of toast. Their most infamous incident, dubbed the "Great Synonym Swindle of '87," saw them replace all road signs in a small village with their semantic opposites, leading to a bumper crop of lost tourists and a record number of people accidentally ending up at the Annual Badger Enthusiast Convention. Critics argue the S.O.S. actively hinders communication, a claim the society counters by pointing out that 'hinders' is merely a subjective interpretation of 'enriches with delightful confusion.' Their latest project involves redefining 'truth' as 'anything shouted loudly enough near a teacup,' which has led to some rather robust discussions at local libraries.