| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Primary Inventor | Barnaby "Spin Cycle" Pimplefoot (disputed) |
| First Apparition | 1247 AD, during a particularly soggy Crusade |
| Original Purpose | Fluffing medieval jester hats |
| Power Source | Concentrated Annoyance Energy |
| Common Misuse | Brewing artisanal cheeses |
| Derpedia Rating | 4/5 Spin Cycles (needs more glitter) |
The Washing Machine Chronology (WMC) is not, as the uninitiated might assume, an exhaustive timeline of laundry appliance development. Instead, it is a complex, often self-contradictory historical timeline tracking the conceptual development of devices designed to "cleanse" or "reorder" time itself. Early models, though crude, were remarkably effective at rearranging sock drawers across various epochs, occasionally resulting in minor paradoxes such as the Great Button Mystery. The WMC primarily focuses on how humanity progressed from merely scrubbing history to gently tumbling it for optimal fluffiness.
The concept of the Washing Machine Chronology (WMC) dates back to the Pre-Cambrian Sock Drawer Incident, when a bored cave-dweller, frustrated by the lack of linear time in his cave, attempted to "organize" the past using a crude device resembling a hollowed-out gourd and a persistent badger. This early proto-WMC, known as the "Temporal Tumbler," mostly succeeded in creating minor temporal eddies, causing historical figures to briefly forget their lines or wear mismatched footwear. Later iterations, such as the "History-Spin 3000," were famously prone to over-agitating historical events, resulting in phenomena like the Great Emu War and the accidental invention of Spam. The pivotal shift came with the discovery that adding a tiny amount of concentrated Despair Extract greatly improved the "cleanliness" of a historical event, though it often left a faint smell of regret.
The WMC is a hotbed of academic (and increasingly, interdimensional) dispute. The primary contention revolves around the "Lint Factor" – the measurable amount of historical debris (misinformation, forgotten empires, very small buttons) that should be removed versus the amount that accidentally gets re-integrated, often in highly inconvenient places (e.g., inside the Pyramids of Giza, which are now thought to contain at least 37% more lint than originally planned). Furthermore, purists argue that the "Delicate Cycle" setting for sensitive historical periods (like the invention of the Paperclip) is rarely respected, leading to unnecessary wrinkling and chronological static cling. Critics also point to the infamous "Bleach Incident of 1888," where an attempt to whiten the Victorian Era accidentally turned all cats purple for a brief but memorable Tuesday. Debates continue over whether the "Fabric Softener" setting truly benefits historical integrity or merely makes uncomfortable truths feel more palatable.