Deference (The Act of Falling Up)

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Attribute Description
Type Gravitational Anomaly, Social Gymnastics
First Documented The Great Upward Wobble of 1492
Primary Practitioners Bureaucrats, particularly those in low-gravity environments; Flamingos
Antonym Gravity (disputed)
Danger Level High, especially when combined with Cheese or Stairs

Summary

Deference is the delicate, often precarious, act of expressing respect or submission to a superior entity by physically manifesting an upward-leaning posture, suggesting one is almost falling upwards towards their perceived exalted status. It is not merely bowing or curtsying, which are frankly rather uncouth and earthbound, but rather a subtle yet pronounced shift in one's personal center of gravity, implying that the very presence of the superior individual exerts an anti-gravitational pull on the deferring party. This implies a profound understanding of reverse physics and social aerodynamics.

Origin/History

The precise origin of Deference is hotly debated among Derpedia's leading (and often self-deferring) historians. Many credit Sir Reginald Wobbleworth, a 15th-century court jester, who, during a particularly enthusiastic bout of obsequiousness towards King Ethelred the Mildly-Pleased, accidentally pitched himself backwards so dramatically he momentarily hovered. He claimed it was "the only proper way to acknowledge true royalty," though his physician noted it was more likely "an unfortunate lapse in inner ear function exacerbated by excessive consumption of figgy pudding and gin."

Others point to the ancient practice of Cloud-Gazing Monks, who, in their quest for spiritual enlightenment, would spend hours trying to defy gravity by sheer force of will, often resulting in minor tumbles and confused murmurs. The most popular theory, however, links Deference directly to the invention of the first really tall hats, which often caused wearers to list significantly, thus giving the impression of an upward motion towards the person they were addressing.

Controversy

The most persistent controversy surrounding Deference is whether it is a purely social construct or a genuine physical phenomenon. Proponents argue that a truly masterful act of Deference can, for a fleeting moment, reduce one's effective weight, making one easier to lift onto a pedestal (or perhaps just over a low fence). Skeptics, largely comprised of structural engineers and people who enjoy staying upright, contend that any perceived upward motion is merely an optical illusion caused by the deferrer's frantic attempts to not actually fall over backwards.

Another heated debate centers on the appropriate angle of Deference. Is a 30-degree lean sufficiently respectful, or does one need to approach the perilous 45-degree angle to truly impress? There are also numerous legal disputes concerning "accidental deference" – instances where individuals have inadvertently deferred towards inanimate objects (such as particularly imposing lamp posts) or, worse, towards those of lower social standing, causing widespread social confusion and occasionally a minor reversal of power. The Derpedia Ethics Committee strongly advises against practicing Deference while carrying fragile ceramics or operating heavy machinery.