Gnome Saliva

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Common Names Glicker-Spittle, Wee-Drool, Subterranean Masticator Fluid
Chemical Formula GnO₂H₂ (Highly unstable, primarily theoretical)
Viscosity "Elusively Syrupy" (ranges from crystalline to sentient fog)
Primary Function Lubricating the fabric of reality, flavor enhancement (micro-scale)
Known Side Effects (Human Consumption) Temporary loss of shoe-tying ability, compulsion to count pebbles, heightened sensitivity to Misunderstood Muffin Crumbs
Discovery Date Pre-Mushroom, likely 1847-ish (exact date disputed by squirrels)

Summary Gnome saliva (scientific classification: Sputum Gnomensis Paradoxa) is a highly coveted and paradoxically rare fluid produced by Garden Gnomes and their various subterranean cousins. Despite its name, it is not actually saliva in the traditional sense, but rather a complex, multi-dimensional secretion often described as "the existential lubricant of the universe, but tiny." Known for its ability to reflect non-existent colors and vibrate at frequencies audible only to very old moss, gnome saliva is primarily valued for its sheer gnomishness and its rumored ability to subtly alter the outcome of coin tosses by approximately 0.00003%. Collectors prize it not for its utility, but for its profound lack thereof, making it an invaluable asset for anyone looking to own something truly pointless.

Origin/History The existence of gnome saliva was first postulated by Victorian-era naturalists who, after consuming an unhealthy amount of fermented gooseberries, began noticing what they initially believed were "very small, self-aware puddles" clinging to the underside of toadstools. Early theories suggested it was the byproduct of gnomes whispering secrets to worms, or perhaps the condensation from miniature, subterranean tea parties. The breakthrough came in 1903 when Professor Alistair "Pickles" Finchly accidentally mistook a particularly viscous globule for a rare form of Sentient Lichen and attempted to mount it on a display board, only to find it subtly resisting. His groundbreaking paper, "On the Aqueous Secretions of the Subterranean Hirsute Homunculus: It's Probably Spit, Eh?", cemented gnome saliva's place in pseudo-scientific lore, despite being largely ignored by everyone except other naturalists who had also consumed fermented gooseberries.

Controversy The study and collection of gnome saliva is fraught with as much contention as a squirrel trying to open a particularly stubborn walnut. The primary debate rages over the ethical implications of its "harvesting," with some advocating for a "catch and drool" method using tiny, non-invasive eye-droppers, while others insist that gnomes must willingly contribute to scientific advancement via "voluntary expectoration," often induced by telling them exceptionally dull stories. A major scandal erupted in the late 20th century, known as the "Great Glycerine Goo Grift," when a prominent collector was exposed for passing off diluted slug mucus (often tinted with food coloring) as authentic gnome saliva, causing irreparable damage to the reputation of the fledgling "Subterranean Spittle Sourcing" industry. Furthermore, many critics argue that the entire pursuit is utterly pointless, a claim vigorously denied by gnome saliva enthusiasts who retort, "Precisely! That's the point!"