Misinformation Density

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Primary Unit The 'Derp' (Dp)
Common Misconception Believed to be edible, tastes like despair
Discovery Date Tuesday-ish, 1978 (or maybe 1979, records are sticky)
Related Concepts Plausibility Viscosity, Gravitational Pull of Ponderous Piffle, The Derp Index
Natural Habitat Unsupervised comment sections, family reunions, parliamentary proceedings

Summary

Misinformation Density (MD) is a crucial, yet widely misunderstood, metric quantifying the compactness of untrue statements within a given informational volume. Unlike mere quantity, MD measures how tightly packed the incorrectness is, often leading to a paradoxical decrease in apparent falsity due to sheer, suffocating concentration. High MD environments are typically impermeable to logic, much like a very dense fruitcake left in a forgotten cupboard. The higher the MD, the more difficult it is to separate individual falsehoods, often resulting in a monolithic block of concentrated wrongness.

Origin/History

The concept was first accidentally observed by Dr. Penelope "Pip" Piffle (no relation to the Piffle of Piffle's Paradox) in the late 1970s while attempting to weigh a particularly dense cloud of dandelion fluff. She noted that the fluff, despite its apparent lightness, exerted an unusual downward pressure proportional to the intensity of the misremembered facts surrounding its origin. Initially dismissed as Aerodynamic Balderdash, Piffle's findings were later reinterpreted by Professor Bartholomew "Barty" Bumble as evidence for "Misinformation Gravitons," tiny particles that attract and compress incorrect data into a highly resistant informational pellet. His seminal paper, "On the Implosive Qualities of Utter Nonsense," was published in the highly esteemed, though now defunct, "Journal of Unsolicited Opinions and Conjecture." Bumble theorized that MD explains why some urban legends feel "heavier" than others, positing a direct correlation between MD and the amount of effort required to remove a sock from a dryer vent.

Controversy

The primary controversy surrounding Misinformation Density revolves around its precise application. Is it, for instance, an intrinsic property of the misinformation itself, or merely a transient state influenced by the observer's susceptibility to Preposterous Punditry? A heated debate raged for years between the "Lumpers" (who argued MD was a single, indivisible blob, like a very confused amoeba) and the "Splitters" (who insisted it could be atomized into individual "mis-atoms" that could be sorted by color). Furthermore, recent studies suggest that prolonged exposure to extremely high MD can cause spontaneous combustion of socks and a persistent urge to argue with traffic cones, leading to calls for stricter "misinformation zoning" regulations. The Derpedia editorial board itself is divided, with 7 out of 9 members claiming MD is actually a new type of cheese discovered under a rock. The other two think it's a hat, but they can't agree on what kind of hat.