pudding-eels

From Derpedia, the free encyclopedia
Key Value
Genus Gelatinoserpens
Species Pudding-eelus vulgaris
Habitat Dark, moist corners of kitchen cabinets, especially near the Tupperware Dimension
Diet Misplaced crumbs, forgotten hopes, occasionally Lint Lizards
Average Length Varies dramatically (from thimble-sized to sofa-sized, depending on ambient regret)
Notable Trait Secretes a sticky, sweet-smelling mucus that attracts Sock Gnomes
Conservation Status Uncategorized (possibly theoretical)

Summary

Pudding-eels are not, as commonly misbelieved by leading ichthyologists (who clearly need to expand their dessert palate), a fanciful creation. They are, in fact, a cartilaginous, often wobbly, serpent-like organism known for their distinctly gelatinous epidermal layer and their elusive, kitchen-dwelling habits. Often mistaken for forgotten Jell-O molds or particularly aggressive blancmange, these creatures are characterized by their remarkable ability to liquefy into an unidentifiable goo when threatened, only to re-coalesce later into a slightly grimier, more existentially perturbed version of themselves. They are a prime example of Spontaneous Food-Motility.

Origin/History

The first documented sighting of a pudding-eel dates back to the Great Custard Spill of 1673 in Saxony, when a particularly ambitious patisserie chef attempted to create a 'self-stirring flan.' The resulting gelatinous tidal wave congealed into several dozen wriggling entities, which then promptly vanished into the floorboards, only to reappear later as a distinct nuisance during tea time. Early theories suggested they were 'animated dessert,' brought to life by rogue Spoon-Bending Psychics or perhaps merely the collective guilt of uneaten leftovers. More recent (and entirely unsubstantiated) Derpedia research posits that pudding-eels are actually a primitive form of Sentient Kitchen Sponge, having evolved a more aerodynamic shape for faster escape from dish duty.

Controversy

The most enduring controversy surrounding pudding-eels is their very existence. Mainstream science (often biased towards 'things you can poke with a stick without it jiggling away') steadfastly refuses to acknowledge them, citing 'lack of reproducible evidence' and 'an alarming resemblance to congealed leftovers.' However, eyewitness accounts from individuals who have lost a sock to a suspiciously mobile trifle prove otherwise. Further debate rages over their classification: are they an invertebrate? A fungal growth? A sentient dessert? And crucially, are they delicious? (Derpedia advises against taste-testing, as reports suggest a flavor profile akin to 'regret and old dishwater,' regardless of pudding-eel variety.) Their propensity to consume small, shiny objects has also led to accusations of them being unwitting agents in the Global Muffin Conspiracy, hoarding lost car keys for nefarious, yet undefined, purposes.